High Prevalence of Refractive errors in an Elderly Population; a Public Health Issue
Sara Sardari1 *, Mehdi Khabazkhoob2
- Noor Research Center for Ophthalmic Epidemiology, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: To determine the prevalence of myopia and hyperopia and their associated demographic and ocular factors in people 60 years of age and above
Methods: The sampling was performed using a multi-stage stratified random cluster sampling method. The complete demographic and case history information were collected through an interview. Then, all participants underwent optometric examinations including measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, objective, and subjective refraction. Myopia and hyperopia were defined as a spherical equivalent (SE) refraction worse than -0.50 diopters (D) and +0.50 D, respectively
Results: 3310 of 3791 invitees participated, and the data of 3263 individuals were analyzed for this report. The mean age of participants was 68.25± 6.53 (60 to 97) years, and 1895 (58.1%) of them were female (number of male/female participants=1368/1895). The prevalence of myopia and hyperopia was 31.65% (95% CI: 29.68 -33.61) and 45.36% (95% CI: 43.36 -47.37), respectively. The prevalence of severe myopia and hyperopia was 1.14% (95% CI: 0.73 -1.55) and 2.27% (95% CI: 1.57 -2.97), respectively. Based on the results of multiple logistic regression, the prevalence of myopia had a statistically significant direct relationship with age (OR: 1.04; p<0.001), history of glaucoma surgery (OR:2.75; p<0.001), pseudophakia (OR: 2.27; p<0.001), axial length (OR:3.05; p<0.001), and mean keratometry (OR:1.61; p<0.001). The education level was significantly inversely related to the myopia prevalence. Moreover, a history of glaucoma surgery (OR:0.44; p<0.001), pseudophakia (OR=0.15; p<0.001), axial length (OR:35; p<0.001) and mean keratometry (OR:0.62; p<0.001) were significantly inversely related to the prevalence of hyperopia. 19% and 40.02% of myopic and hyperopic patients had complete visual acuity after correction of refractive error, respectively
Conclusion: The prevalence of refractive errors was high in the Iranian elderly population. A large percentage of the elderly still did not have complete visual acuity after the correction of refractive errors indicating the necessity for attention to other ocular diseases in this age group. The history of cataract and glaucoma surgery could be associated with a myopic shift of refractive error.
